Our community is not best served by one single group

Our community is not best served by one single group or organization. [Opinion piece follows 🙂 ]

As an individual it’s important to be skeptical when we have just one single source of learning and direction for our community. If we tie ourselves to a single source (i.e. group, organization, business, scheme) we are tying ourselves to a narrow (and potentially narrowing) point of view.

If we do narrow our focus to a single source we will hinder our knowledge growth and our learning scope. I believe there is another side effect though – the wider community will become more fragmented and distant as we become less tolerant of alternative views…(I have no evidence for this, just observations)

Groups that were once a mouthpiece and meeting ground for the unheard and diverse minorities soon narrow as they find a niche, or attract a tipping point of like minded people – this is natural which is why there is always room for new groups and communities to emerge to fill the gaps.

As groups narrow they will focus on specific areas. Some of these groups will inevitably try to make money by selling services (or information) to survive, some will just tumble along whilst others will seek external funding. Some will disappear. Some that do disappear will leave a gap to be filled, some will not be missed.

We need to be sure to keep our mind open and notice when we start to become focused too narrowly on our learning and our community involvement. It’s not heresy to switch communities or to exist across several seemingly different communities. In fact, I would positively encourage mixing views and opinions together. Our interests and persona’s are elastic, we must try not to resist this.

Look at the standardization schemes. In order to scale (i.e. to make money – assuming you believe this is the primary goal of those behind them) the content must to be filtered down, made consistent and change as infrequently as possible (what a bind it would be to re-print the marketing and other collateral every week to keep up with industry innovation).

In order to embark on such a dramatic process those behind it will seek to own the learning material contained within. They may want to protect it. They may want to ensure they are the only ones offering it. They may tell you that you cannot get this learning elsewhere. (note: some communities do this also)

They are wrong. Some, if not all, of the information is available freely (or at least cheaply) to us, on any device or platform we care to consume it from. Not only that but it may be opinionated (in a good and/or bad way), will naturally be diverse (if we look far enough for it) and is hopefully being shared by people actually doing the work. It will therefore change often. This is good.

And as it’s freely available we could, and probably should, mash it around, mix it up, fine tune it, fix it, extend it, delete it, try it, ignore it and make of it what we need it to be. This will be where the giant leaps in our thinking about testing will come from. From us; the testing community mashing together ideas to see what works, and what doesn’t.

And once we’ve made of it what we want then we could share it so that others can do the same. This will lead us to an evolution (or a revolution) in the way we approach testing.

Instead of small incremental improvements on the standards/norms we might see a major sea change and a dramatic shifting of our craft – I look forward to this day.

I believe the testing community needs more people to seek out diversity in our sources of learning and inspiration.

I also believe we could challenge anyone and anything that suggests a single source of information and direction is the right thing for us. We could seek out the free and open source learning that is available to us. We could challenge the old guard and stale approaches to learning (and teaching) of software testing.

We could create a community of interest if one does not exist. We could seek clarity as to whether someone is protecting a mass of knowledge for the right reasons (and no-one should begrudge anyone making a living from selling what they know) or whether it is to seek conformity and standards of the masses.

But most of all we should try hard not to let ourselves sink in to the sea of conformity and oblivion that is consuming so many people where we simply become a nodding and compliant member of a single source of direction for our community. I know we can do better. Our craft is evolving and we need more people to help gain momentum to nudge it to a diverse future rather than single path of conformity. We can do that.

5 thoughts on “Our community is not best served by one single group

  1. “Single source of learning” – Is that even possible in current WWW conditions?
    Anyone who wish to learn – can find vast sources from all over the world,
    Using Forums, Blogs, Twitter, RSS Feeds, conferences, courses and numerous other services.

    Discussion and opinions are there, and can be as high as the number of readers who care to comment.

    The only issue – is making more testers actually care to interact.

    @halperinko – Kobi Halperin

    1. The web is just a channel so it is entirely possible to be learning from a single source across many mediums but I think the chances of people encountering different views increases on social channels via the web. I think you’re spot on though “The only issue – is making more testers actually care to interact.” – nicely put.

  2. “I believe the testing community needs more people to seek out diversity in our sources of learning and inspiration.”

    I love working with people from diverse backgrounds, whether it’s educational or work related. You get a better diversity of ideas.

    The context-driven community is great for that, but it does have a tendency for a few loud voices to shout over the rest. Test practitioners and thinkers need to be wary of that, and try to avoid becoming an echo-chamber for the same ideas, no matter how smart the ideas might sound. Don’t just be wary of certificates and standards, be wary that your own tendency to fall into ideology, group think, and reflexive rhetoric.

    Good rant. Thanks for sharing.

    1. Hi Geoff,

      Thanks for commenting. I like the points you make. I must admit I sometimes find myself echoing something only to sit back and realise I don’t believe it 🙂


Comments are closed.